Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
DOLLARIZATION AND THE ECONOMY
  • TONY HAWKINS
2
PANACEA
3
"When,"
4
"We were spot on."
5
"Dollarization (or perhaps Randization"
6
BENEFITS
7
DEPOLITICISING MONEY
8
INFLATION
9
CPI
10
CROSS BORDER COMPARISONS
11
PURCHASING POWER PARITY
12
WHY?
13
MARK-UPS
14
THRESHOLDS
15
CURRENCY BOARD?
16
"That will change however as..."
17
CREDIT CREATION
18
SCARCE CREDIT
19
RAND LOANS
20
ADVANTAGES
21
DRAWBACKS
22
DISADVANTAGES
23
TECHNICAL, BANKING ISSUES
24
CRITICAL ISSUES
25
1. RAND VERSUS DOLLAR
26
Rand versus Dollar
27
(a) GEO-POLITICAL
28
MONETARY INTEGRATION
29
(b) WEAK CURRENCY
30
DEVALUATION
31
NO OPTION
32
"Going forward the signs are..."
33
THREE DOWNSIDES
34
NO ALTERNATIVE
35
POPULISM
36
LEGAL TENDER
37
CONSISTENCY
38
(c) CONVENIENCE
39
CLARITY
40
NEW CURRENCY
41
EXIT PLAN
42
ISSUE TWO: DOLLAR LIQUIDITY
43
DOLLAR LIQUIDITY
44
SUPPLY SIDE
45
THREE CRUCIAL ASPECTS
46
PREREQUISITES
47
TIME
48
CREDIBILITY
49
CONFUSION
50
CONFUSION - TWO
51
72 Ministers
52
THE GLOBAL ECONOMY
53
EXPORTS WILL FALL
54
GRIDLOCK
55
RECAPITALIZATION?
56
WHO?
57
FULL DOLLARIZATION
58
FEASIBILITY?
59
IMPOVERISHMENT
60
RECAPITALIZING INDUSTRY
61
ISSUE 3 – ELEVATED PRICES AND WAGE DEMANDS
62
ELEVATED PRICES AND WAGE DEMANDS
63
BUSINESS MODELS
64
WHY PROFITS BOOMED
  • Real wages fell as prices escalated
  • Formal sector employment collapsed
  • Productivity  increased while real wages declined
  • Accordingly, margins widened but firms were generating paper – not real – profits because accounting practices do not reflect inflation adequately
65
WIDENING GAP
  • Puzzlingly, productivity rose while real GDP per head and real wages fell, with wages falling far more.
  •  In 1990, there was virtually no gap between productivity and real wages.
  • By 2006 however, real wages were only about a quarter of productivity per head.
66
THE JAWS SYNDROME
Wages and Profits as % of GDP
67
GDP, Wages and Productivity (constant prices)
68
"The striking finding – consistent..."
69
MARKUPS
70
EXPLANATIONS
  • Inflation exaggerates profits because:
  • Firms do not provide adequate depreciation of their capital
  • Because stock (or holding) gains arise from the use of historical accounts in respect of stocks and inventories.
71
FIRE-FIGHTING
  • Management boosted margins by
  • Cost cutting
  • Retrenchment
  • Delaying maintenance
  • Postponing investment, and
  • Cutting back on training and advertising and marketing budgets
72
NON CORE ACTIVITIES
  • Firms boosted profits by non-core activities:
  • Trading in foreign exchange
  • Investing – temporary – surpluses in the stock market or the money market
  • This last aspect is important because it suggests that trading margins were only part of the explanation
73
TIME TO GET REAL
74
UNSUSTAINABLE BUSINESS MODELS
75
PRODUCTIVITY
76
PRICING
77
INTERACTION
78
THE HONEYMOON IS OVER
79
DEVALUATION NOT AN OPTION
80
DOMESTIC ADJUSTMENT
81
WAGES
82
SOLUTION?
83
TRANSACTION COSTS
84
COMPETITION
85
CONFRONTATION?
86
COMPETITION
87
UNSUSTAINABLE PROFITS
88
THE JAWS SYNDROME
Wages and Profits as % of GDP
89
"The realities are:"
90
"But also,"
91
"What I am saying –..."
92
Wages not the main driver
93
REGIONAL RELATIVITY
94
PPP AGAIN
95
NOT A STARTER
96
NO FREE LUNCHES
97
EXPECTATIONS
98
PROSPECTS
99
MINING DOWN
100
DISTRIBUTION GAINS
101
GROWTH IN THE SECOND HALF
102
NO QUICK FIX